In a recent podcast, Janet Jackson has openly accused Oprah Winfrey of betraying her brother, Michael Jackson, by manipulating him into participating in a 1993 interview that many believe ultimately damaged his career. This revelation comes amidst renewed scrutiny of Winfrey’s relationship with the Jackson family, particularly following the release of the controversial documentary “Leaving Neverland.”

Janet’s allegations focus on Oprah’s promise to portray Michael positively during the interview, which was intended to address numerous tabloid rumors about his personal life. Instead, Janet contends that Oprah used the opportunity to ask intrusive questions, undermining Michael’s character and contributing to a negative public perception that haunted him until his death.

During the podcast with journalist Lisa Robinson, Janet expressed her belief that Oprah’s motivations were driven by jealousy and a desire for ratings, warning Michael against the interview. After airing, the conversation devolved into speculation and scrutiny over Michael’s appearance, relationships, and lifestyle, leading to increased media attention and, ultimately, allegations of sexual abuse that surfaced later that same year.

Since the documentary “Leaving Neverland” aired, which featured accusations from two men claiming abuse by Michael Jackson, Oprah’s involvement in promoting the film has intensified the backlash against her. Many fans and family members, including Michael’s brother Jermaine and cousin Brandy, have publicly criticized Oprah for what they see as a betrayal of trust.

The Jackson family remains vocal about their grievances, with calls for Oprah to apologize for her role in perpetuating a narrative they argue is not only damaging but also unfounded. Janet’s sentiments echo a growing sentiment among Michael’s supporters who believe Oprah’s actions contributed significantly to the tarnishing of his legacy.

As this controversy unfolds, it raises questions about the ethics of media representation, particularly concerning public figures and their families, and whether accountability is due when personal narratives are sensationalized for ratings.