THE “STRANGLING GALLOWS” — HOW POSTWAR EUROPE USED SLOW HANGINGS TO EXECUTE NAZI WAR CRIMINALS IN FRONT OF THOUSANDS

 

Central Europe.

A condemned man stands before a tall wooden pole.

His hands are tied behind his back.

A sling supports his chest as executioners raise him upward toward a hook fixed near the top of the structure.

A narrow noose is placed around his neck.

Another rope is tied to his ankles.

Then suddenly—

the chest sling is released.

Assistants yank downward on the ankle rope.

His body jerks violently.

The noose tightens.

And death begins slowly.

Not the fast neck-breaking executions used in Britain.

Not the calculated “long drop” perfected by British hangman Albert Pierrepoint.

This method was different.

It was designed around strangulation.

And after World War II, it became one of the most infamous execution methods used against Nazi war criminals across Central Europe.

THE GALLOWS DESIGNED TO STRANGLE, NOT BREAK THE NECK

The execution method was known as:

“Verwürgungsgalgen”
or more simply, “pole hanging.”

The drop was tiny:

roughly 15–20 centimeters.

Far too short to snap the neck cleanly.

Instead, death came through:

  • compression of the carotid arteries
  • blockage of the airway
  • swelling pressure inside the brain
  • gradual oxygen deprivation

Unlike British long-drop executions, unconsciousness was not guaranteed instantly.

Some condemned prisoners reportedly struggled visibly for extended periods.

THE EXECUTIONER WHO CLAIMED “NO ONE SUFFERED”

Austrian executioner:

Josef Lang

used the method extensively during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Lang claimed no condemned person suffered for more than a minute.

Modern forensic analysis strongly questions that claim.

Today, medical experts understand that strangulation deaths can vary enormously depending on:

  • rope position
  • neck anatomy
  • force applied
  • blood flow compression

Some victims may lose consciousness quickly.

Others may remain aware much longer.

That uncertainty became one of the method’s darkest features.

THE EXECUTION METHOD THAT SURVIVED AN EMPIRE

The pole hanging system originated inside the:

Austro-Hungarian Empire.

When the empire collapsed after World War I, successor states inherited both its legal codes and execution methods.

Countries including:

  • Austria
  • Hungary
  • Czechoslovakia

continued using the pole method legally for decades.

In Czechoslovakia, it remained the official execution method until 1954.

WHY THE METHOD MATTERED AFTER WORLD WAR II

After Nazi occupation ended in 1945, Central Europe faced an enormous question:

How should collaborators and war criminals be punished?

The answer, in many places, became public execution.

And not hidden, clinical executions.

Visible ones.

Slow ones.

Executions thousands of civilians could watch.

THE NAZI REGIME HAD USED HANGING AS TERROR

Ironically, Nazi Germany itself had revived hanging as a major instrument of political terror.

At Plötzensee Prison, thousands were executed by hanging.

Among them were members of the:

20 July plot

the failed conspiracy to assassinate Hitler.

The Nazis reportedly used short cords and hooks fixed to execution chamber rails.

Victims were humiliated deliberately before death.

Some executions were filmed for Hitler himself to watch afterward.

THE EXECUTIONS OF THE JULY 20 CONSPIRATORS

Men like:

  • Claus von Stauffenberg
  • Erwin von Witzleben

became symbols of resistance after attempting to kill Hitler in 1944.

Those captured alive were dragged before the infamous Nazi judge:

Roland Freisler.

Executions followed immediately afterward at Plötzensee.

Witnesses later described the process as intentionally degrading and prolonged.

THE POSTWAR REVERSAL

After liberation, the same region turned to its own hanging traditions to punish Nazi officials.

But now the condemned were SS officers, collaborators, and occupation authorities.

The legal symbolism mattered enormously.

Many governments deliberately chose not to adopt British or American “more humane” methods.

Instead, they used their own inherited systems.

Their own courts.

Their own gallows.

THE EXECUTION OF KARL HERMANN FRANK

One of the most important examples occurred on May 22nd, 1946.

At Pankrác Prison, senior Nazi official:

Karl Hermann Frank

was publicly executed by pole hanging.

Frank had overseen brutal repression inside occupied Bohemia and Moravia.

Including responsibility connected to the destruction of:

Lidice massacre.

THE 5,000 PEOPLE WHO CAME TO WATCH HIM DIE

The execution drew approximately 5,000 spectators.

Many more had requested permission to attend.

In the crowd sat widows from Lidice — women whose husbands had been executed under Nazi occupation.

Frank reportedly walked calmly to the scaffold.

Then declared:

“Germany will live even if we do not live.”

Moments later, the noose tightened around his neck before thousands of witnesses.

The execution was filmed.

THE PUBLIC HANGINGS AT GDAŃSK

Another major postwar execution spectacle occurred on July 4th, 1946.

At Gdańsk, former guards and officials from:

Stutthof concentration camp

were publicly hanged.

Among the condemned were female camp guards including:

  • Jenny-Wanda Barkmann
  • Gerda Steinhoff

The executions used short-drop strangulation methods similar in physiological effect to pole hanging.

Huge crowds gathered to watch.

THE FALL OF HUNGARY’S FASCIST LEADER

In Hungary, former Arrow Cross dictator:

Ferenc Szálasi

was executed by hanging in March 1946.

Szálasi had ruled Hungary during the deportation and murder of hundreds of thousands of Jews.

Photographs from his execution show the same pole-style apparatus used in the Hungarian legal system.

THE WOMAN WHO POINTED NEIGHBORS TO THEIR DEATHS

One of the most disturbing postwar cases involved:

Hertha Kašparová.

A 23-year-old Sudeten German woman.

She had worked for the Gestapo as a translator during the occupation.

Witnesses testified that in the war’s final days she rode through town with SS officers pointing out Czech civilians for execution.

At trial, she openly admitted acting partly from personal revenge.

She was sentenced to death by pole hanging and executed publicly in 1946.

Witnesses described her collapsing in terror before the execution began.

She became the last woman publicly executed in Czechoslovakia.

THE EXECUTION METHOD THAT DIVIDED HISTORIANS

The contrast between British and Central European executions became morally significant after the war.

British hangman Albert Pierrepoint argued executions should produce unconsciousness instantly through precise neck fracture calculations.

The Central European systems often made no such guarantee.

Critics later argued these executions drifted dangerously close to vengeance rather than purely legal punishment.

Supporters argued populations devastated by occupation demanded visible accountability.

THE WIDOWS IN THE SECOND ROW

One image became symbolic of the entire postwar reckoning.

At Karl Hermann Frank’s execution sat seven widows from Lidice watching the man connected to their husbands’ deaths die on the gallows.

That image captured the central tension of postwar justice:

Was this law?

Revenge?

Closure?

Or something impossible to separate cleanly?

THE GALLOWS THAT DISAPPEARED

Eventually, public executions faded.

By the 1950s, executions in Czechoslovakia moved behind prison walls.

The old poles disappeared.

The crowds vanished.

But the photographs remained:

  • condemned war criminals standing beneath the gallows
  • widows watching from the crowd
  • execution ropes tightening in public squares

THE QUESTION HISTORY NEVER FULLY ANSWERED

The strangling gallows became more than an execution method.

It became a symbol of what shattered societies do after years of atrocity.

The people who chose these executions were often survivors of occupation, massacres, concentration camps, and terror.

Many believed slow public death was justice.

Others later viewed it as another form of brutality growing out of the same violent era.

And that is why the history of the pole hanging still feels disturbing today:

Because it sits in the gray space between lawful punishment…

…and the human desire to make suffering visible to the people who caused it.