The Cleveland Browns organization is once again at the center of a storm of controversy and confusion, as a bombshell report from Mary Kay Cabot of cleveland.com has sent shockwaves through the fanbase and the NFL landscape. According to sources inside the team, Deshaun Watson has the inside track to be named the starting quarterback for the 2026 season, a development that has left many fans and analysts reeling.

The report, which emerged from the Browns’ voluntary mini camp held just before the NFL draft, indicates that Watson has already taken the majority of first-team reps, including critical drills in the red zone and two-minute offense. Sources told Cabot that Watson “earned the QB1 snaps by looking the part of a starting quarterback” during the camp’s second day. This is a stunning reversal for a player who has been a lightning rod for criticism since his arrival in Cleveland.

Watson’s tenure with the Browns has been nothing short of disastrous. Since signing a fully guaranteed $230 million contract, he has started only 19 games over five seasons, posting a losing record of 9-10. He missed the entire 2021 season due to 30 allegations of sexual misconduct, was suspended 13 games in 2022, and then missed all of 2025 after tearing his Achilles twice. His performance in 2024 was widely regarded as the worst among starting quarterbacks in the league.
The news has ignited a firestorm of anger and disbelief among Browns fans, many of whom believed the Watson experiment was over after owner Jimmy Haslam publicly admitted the trade was a “big swing that missed.” The team’s decision to potentially hand the reins back to Watson, rather than turning to second-year quarterback Shedeur Sanders, has been met with incredulity.

Cabot’s report also revealed that head coach Kevin Stefanski and offensive coordinator Todd Monken want the starter named by June 11th, a deadline that would allow the offense to build cohesion and avoid the chaos of a four-quarterback competition that plagued the team last season. The Browns are determined to avoid the mistakes of 2025, when dividing reps among multiple quarterbacks set the offense back significantly.
The rationale behind leaning toward Watson, according to sources, is his experience in learning new systems. Watson has been praised for his ability to slide protections, make pre-snap adjustments, and execute motions that a veteran quarterback would know. In contrast, Sanders, who showed flashes of promise in seven starts last season, is still learning the nuances of the offense and would need to “dazzle” the coaching staff to win the job.
This assessment has infuriated many, who argue that Sanders deserves a fair chance to prove himself with a much-improved supporting cast. The Browns have bolstered their offensive line, added weapons at wide receiver, and installed a new system that is expected to be more quarterback-friendly. Critics contend that starting Watson, who has not played a full season in years and has shown no signs of returning to his Pro Bowl form from six years ago, is a recipe for disaster.
The frustration reached a boiling point when team executive JW Johnson, the son-in-law of owner Jimmy Haslam, went on ESPN Cleveland and made comments that many interpreted as dismissive. Johnson said, “He’s our starting quarterback. I know there are people that probably won’t be supportive, but they should need to be supportive as much as they can. If he plays great, then awesome. If he doesn’t, then it is what it is.”
The phrase “it is what it is” has become a rallying cry for fans who feel the organization is treating the quarterback position with a cavalier attitude. Johnson’s role in the front office has also come under scrutiny, with many questioning his qualifications beyond his family connection. The perception that the team is simply “throwing Watson out there to see how it goes” has only deepened the sense of betrayal.
The Browns are also dealing with the loss of two key free agents. Defensive tackle Shelby Harris, a respected veteran who appeared in over 140 career games, has signed with the New York Giants. Harris was a fan favorite, known for his memorable blocked kick in a win against the Packers and his colorful postgame comments. His departure leaves a hole in the defensive line depth.
Cornerback Martin Emerson Jr. has also left the building, signing a one-year deal with the New Orleans Saints. General Manager Andrew Berry had expressed a desire to keep Emerson but acknowledged it was not realistic. The loss of these two players, combined with the quarterback controversy, has made for a tumultuous offseason in Cleveland.
The decision to start Watson carries enormous risk. He has not played a full season since 2020, and his body has been through two Achilles tears and a shoulder injury. The last time he sat out for an extended period, he returned looking rusty and ineffective. The Browns are betting that a new system and a healthier roster can revive a player who has not been the same since his days with the Houston Texans.
For Shedeur Sanders, the situation is equally frustrating. He was drafted as the future of the franchise, but now faces the prospect of riding the bench while the team tries to salvage the Watson experiment. Many believe the Browns should use this season to evaluate Sanders, especially with a potential franchise quarterback available in the 2027 draft. Starting Watson, who has already been evaluated and found wanting, seems like a wasted opportunity.
The fanbase is already bracing for a potential disaster. If Watson struggles and the Browns miss the playoffs, the calls for change will be deafening. The city of Cleveland has endured years of quarterback misery, and the thought of another season with Watson under center has many fans questioning their loyalty.
The Browns’ front office, however, appears to be all-in on Watson. The sudden shift in tone from team officials, who are now talking up Watson’s health and mindset, suggests they are trying to prepare the public for his return. JW Johnson’s comments about Watson having “nothing to lose” only add to the sense that the organization is in denial about the gravity of the situation.
The clock is ticking. With a June 11th deadline looming, the Browns must make a decision that will define their season. The choice between Watson and Sanders is not just a football decision; it is a referendum on the team’s leadership, its commitment to winning, and its respect for its fanbase.
As the news continues to break, the reaction from fans has been swift and visceral. Social media is flooded with one-word reactions, from “disgusted” to “furious” to “resigned.” The Browns have become a national punchline, and the Watson saga is the latest chapter in a story that seems to have no end.
The team’s new offensive system, designed by Monken, is expected to be more dynamic and quarterback-friendly. But no system can overcome a quarterback who has lost his confidence, his mobility, and his connection with the fanbase. Watson’s return would be a test of whether the Browns can overcome the weight of their own history.
For now, the Browns are in a holding pattern. The mini camp showed that Watson is being treated as the favorite, but nothing is official. Sanders still has six weeks to close the gap, but the bar has been set high. He must not only outperform Watson but do so overwhelmingly.
The Browns have made their bed, and now they must lie in it. The decision to start Watson could either be a redemption story or a final nail in the coffin of a franchise that has been searching for stability for decades. The coming weeks will reveal the path forward, but one thing is clear: the Browns are once again the center of the NFL’s most controversial story.